Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Department
Medicine
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
The American Journal of Cardiology
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors via intracoronary (IC) route versus the intravenous (IV) route are not well known. We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating the role of IC versus IV glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The analysis included 14 trials with a total of 3,754 patients. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) had no statistically significant difference between the IC and the IV groups (relative risk [RR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 1.10). Subgroup analysis showed that short-term MACE (i.e., ≤3 months) was reduced in the IC compared with the IV group; however, long-term MACE (> 3 months) was not. IC group was superior in achievement of post-procedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11), myocardial blush grade II to III (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.23), ST-segment resolution rates (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.29; p = 0.01), and improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (standardized mean difference = 4.32, 95% CI 0.91 to 7.74). There was a trend for lower stent thrombosis with IC route (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.03). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in all-cause mortality, re-infarction, and major bleeding. In conclusion, despite lack of significant difference in overall MACE outcome, IC glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may improve short -term MACE, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow, myocardial blush grade II- to III rates, ST-segment resolution, and left ventricular ejection fraction compared with the IV route.
First Page
1055
Last Page
1061
DOI
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.040
Volume
120
Issue
7
Publication Date
10-1-2017
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Injections, Intra-Arterial; Injections, Intravenous; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors (administration & dosage); Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex (antagonists & inhibitors); Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (therapy)
PubMed ID
28826897
Recommended Citation
Elbadawi, A., Elgendy, I. Y., Megaly, M., Ha, L. D., Mahmoud, K., Alotaki, E., Ogunbayo, G. O., Baig, B., Abuzaid, A. S., Saad, M., & Depta, J. P. (2017). Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology, 120 (7), 1055-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.040