Pomalidomide-Based Regimens for Treatment of Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
Department
Medicine
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pomalidomide (Pom) has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative activity in combination regimens as a result of its distinct anticancer, antiangiogenic, and immunomodulatory effects. This review aimed to compare outcome measures of different Pom regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified a total of 1374 studies. Thirty-five studies assessing 4623 subjects met the inclusion criteria: phase 2/3 trial, ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, and clearly documented efficacy outcomes like overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, and progression-free survival. Statistical analyses for meta-analysis was performed by CMA version 3 and Cochrane Q statistics (P < .05 considered significant, I index for heterogeneity). A random effects model was used if there was significant heterogeneity (P ≥ .05 over I ≥ 50%). RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed ORR 47.1% across all Pom-based (2- and 3-drug) regimens. Stratified analysis for efficacy outcomes (pooled ORR [%] and mean progression-free survival [months]) are reported. With doublet regimen, Pom with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex) was the most common regimen (35.7%, 6.1 months), and overall survival was 14.37 months. With triplet regimens, pooled ORR was 61.9% (I = 87.3%). These included bortezomib + Pom + LoDex (83.5%, 15.7 months), carfilzomib-Pom + LoDex (77.1%, 15.3 months), Pom + LoDex-bendamustine (74.2%), Pom-dexamethasone-daratumumab (64.5%), Pom + LoDex-cyclophosphamide (59.4%, 9.5 months), and Pom + LoDex-doxorubicin (32%). Leading adverse events were myelosuppression, with mean incidences of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of 47.6%, 26.5%, and 20.8%, respectively. Mean incidence of grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events were infections 29.1%, pneumonia 13.8%, and fatigue 10%. CONCLUSION: Three-drug Pom regimens yielded double the response rates compared to Pom + LoDex (pooled ORR, 61.9% vs. 35.7%), with bortezomib + Pom + LoDex and carfilzomib-Pom + LoDex demonstrating better outcomes than other regimens.
First Page
447
Last Page
461
DOI
10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.003
Volume
19
Issue
7
Publication Date
7-1-2019
Medical Subject Headings
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (adverse effects, therapeutic use); Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Multiple Myeloma (drug therapy, mortality, pathology); Recurrence; Retreatment; Thalidomide (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives); Treatment Outcome
PubMed ID
31060991
Recommended Citation
Mushtaq, A., Iftikhar, A., Hassan, H., Lakhani, M., Sagar, F., Kamal, A., Zahid, U., Ali, Z., Razzaq, F., Zar, M. A., Hassan, S. F., Safdar, A., Raychaudhuri, S., & Anwer, F. (2019). Pomalidomide-Based Regimens for Treatment of Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, 19 (7), 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.003