Estimating urine volume from the urine creatinine concentration
Department
Medicine
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation
Abstract
Spot determinations of the urine creatinine concentration are widely used as a substitute for 24-hour urine collections. Expressed as the amount excreted per gram of creatinine, urine concentrations in a single-voided sample are often used to estimate 24-hour excretion rates of protein, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, urea, and uric acid. These estimates are predicated on the assumption that daily creatinine excretion equals 1 gm (and that a urine creatinine concentration of 100 mg/dl reflects a 1 Liter 24-hour urine volume). Such estimates are invalid if the serum creatinine concentration is rising or falling. In addition, because creatinine excretion is determined by muscle mass, the assumption that 24-hour urine creatinine excretion equals 1 gm yields a misleading estimate at the extremes of age and body size. In this review we evaluate seven equations for the accuracy of their estimates of urine volume based on urine creatinine concentrations in actual and idealized patients. None of the equations work well in patients who are morbidly obese or in patients with markedly decreased muscle mass. In other patients, estimates based on a reformulation of the Cockroft-Gault equation are reasonably accurate. A recent study based on this relationship found a high strength of correlation between estimated and measured urine output with chronic kidney disease (CKD) studied in the African American Study of Kidney Disease (AASK) trial and for the patients studied in the CKD Optimal Management with Binders and NictomidE (COMBINE) trial. However, the equation systematically underestimated urine output in the AASK trial. Hence, an intercept was added to account for the bias in estimated output. A more rigorous equation, derived from an ambulatory Swiss population, that includes body mass index and models the non-linear accelerated decline in creatinine excretion with age, could potentially be more accurate in overweight and elderly patients. In addition to extremes of body weight and muscle mass, decreased dietary intake or reduced hepatic synthesis of creatine, a precursor of creatinine, or ingestion of creatine supplements will also result in inaccurate estimates. These limitations must be appreciated to rationally use predictive equations to estimate urine volume. If the baseline urine creatinine concentration is determined in a sample of known volume, subsequent urine creatinine concentrations will reveal actual urine output as well as the change in urine output. Given the constraints of the various estimating equations, a single baseline timed collection may be more useful strategy for monitoring urine volume than entering anthropomorphic data into a calculator.
First Page
811
Last Page
818
DOI
10.1093/ndt/gfab337
Volume
38
Issue
4
Publication Date
3-31-2023
PubMed ID
34850163
Recommended Citation
Dong, Y., Silver, S., & Sterns, R. H. (2023). Estimating urine volume from the urine creatinine concentration. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 38 (4), 811-818. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab337
Comments
Record updated with published article citation 2023-04-13 LB.
Published online ahead of print 2021-11-25.