Angiographic-only or intravascular ultrasound-guided approach for left-main coronary artery intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Department
Medicine
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Abstract
Introduction: The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in percutaneous revascularization of left-main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) warrants further exploration. We aimed to collate all available data on the merits of IVUS in LMCAD to help decision-making.
Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies (OCS). The data were analyzed using random-effects model to calculate unadjusted odds ratio (OR) between IVUS-guided and angiography-only LMCA revascularization.
Results: A total of 14 studies (2 RCTs and 12 OCS), comprising 18944 patients, were included. The pooled odds of all-cause mortality (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.46-0.70, p =
Conclusion: IVUS-guided LMCA intervention is associated with overall improved cardiovascular outcomes than the angiography-only approach. This needs to be tested in a large randomized controlled trial.
First Page
1029
Last Page
1035
DOI
10.1080/14779072.2021.2004122
Volume
19
Issue
11
Publication Date
11-26-2021
PubMed ID
34747315
Recommended Citation
Saleem, S., Ullah, W., Mukhtar, M., Sarvepalli, D., Younas, S., & Zahid, S. (2021). Angiographic-only or intravascular ultrasound-guided approach for left-main coronary artery intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 19 (11), 1029-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2021.2004122
Comments
See full list of authors at journal website.