Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Department
Internal Medicine
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine : Including Molecular Interventions
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is an alternative accepted therapy to unfractionated heparin for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed in this meta-analysis to compare bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with MI undergoing PCI.
METHODS: We have screened PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through January 8th, 2023) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with MI undergoing PCI. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used for estimation of tau2 to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Ten RCTs with a total of 40,069 participants were included in our analysis. Bivalirudin as compared with unfractionated heparin was associated with significant decrease in major bleeding (RR 0.64 [0.52 to 0.79]; p < 0.01; I2 = 69 %) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.79 [0.67 to 0.92]; p < 0.01; I2 = 0 %). There was no significant difference between bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin groups in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 1.02 [0.91 to 1.14]; p = 0.73; I2 = 52 %), all-cause mortality (RR 0.89 [0.77 to 1.04]; p = 0.15; I2 = 23 %), MI (RR 1.02 [0.87 to 1.19]; p = 0.80; I2 = 36 %), stent thrombosis (RR 1.12 [0.52 to 2.40]; p = 0.77; I2 = 82 %), or stroke (RR 0.97 [0.73 to 1.29]; p = 0.85; I2 = 0 %).
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients with MI undergoing PCI was associated with lower rates of major bleeding and cardiovascular mortality without a significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis.
First Page
52
Last Page
61
DOI
10.1016/j.carrev.2023.10.014
Volume
61
Publication Date
4-1-2024
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Heparin (adverse effects); Antithrombins (adverse effects); Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Hirudins (adverse effects); Myocardial Infarction (diagnosis, therapy, complications); Peptide Fragments (adverse effects); Hemorrhage (chemically induced); Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (adverse effects, methods); Stroke (etiology); Thrombosis (etiology); Recombinant Proteins (adverse effects); Anticoagulants (adverse effects)
PubMed ID
37872022
Recommended Citation
Al-Abdouh, A., Mhanna, M., Jabri, A., Madanat, L., Alhuneafat, L., Reda Mostafa, M., Kundu, A., & Gupta, V. (2024). Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine : Including Molecular Interventions, 61, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2023.10.014