Fall Risk Assessment in Stroke Survivors: A Machine Learning Model Using Detailed Motion Data from Common Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking
Department
Neurology
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Falls are common and dangerous for stroke survivors. Current fall risk assessment methods rely on subjective scales. Objective sensor-based methods could improve prediction accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: Develop machine learning models using inertial sensors to objectively classify fall risk in stroke survivors. Determine optimal sensor configurations and clinical test protocols.
METHODS: 21 stroke survivors performed balance, Timed Up and Go, 10 Meter Walk, and Sit-to-Stand tests with and without dual-tasking. A total of 8 motion sensors captured lower limb and trunk kinematics, and 92 spatiotemporal gait and clinical features were extracted. Supervised models-Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest-were implemented to classify high vs. low fall risk. Sensor setups and test combinations were evaluated.
RESULTS: The Random Forest model achieved 91% accuracy using dual-task balance sway and Timed Up and Go walk time features. Single thorax sensor models performed similarly to multi-sensor models. Balance and Timed Up and Go best-predicted fall risk.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning models using minimal inertial sensors during clinical assessments can accurately quantify fall risk in stroke survivors. Single thorax sensor setups are effective. Findings demonstrate a feasible objective fall screening approach to assist rehabilitation.
First Page
812
DOI
10.3390/s24030812
Volume
24
Issue
3
Publication Date
1-26-2024
PubMed ID
38339529
Recommended Citation
Abdollahi, M., Rashedi, E., Jahangiri, S., Kuber, P. M., Azadeh-Fard, N., & Dombovy, M. (2024). Fall Risk Assessment in Stroke Survivors: A Machine Learning Model Using Detailed Motion Data from Common Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 24 (3), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030812