Sex Differences In Outcomes Of Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support

Authors

Miluska O. Mejia Trebejo, Rochester Regional HealthFollow
Katia Bravo Jaimes
Nadia Abelhad
Yelin Zhou

Department

Internal Medicine

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Title

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Conference Name

AAC.21

Conference Date

2021-05-17

Abstract

There is evidence for lower use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) in women. We aimed to determine (1) whether sex differences exists regarding in-hospital mortality, hospital course and procedures, (2) whether socio-demographic and treatment-related factors were associated with these differences.

First Page

824

DOI

10.1016/S0735-1097(21)02183-5

Volume

77

Issue

18_Supplement_1

Publication Date

5-1-2021

Publisher

American College of Cardiology Foundation Washington DC

Comments

See full list of authors at journal website.

Poster Contributions:

Monday, May 17, 2021, 9:45 a.m.-10:30 a.m.

Session Title: Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: Mechanical Support and Cardiac Transplantation 3

Abstract Category: 10. Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: Mechanical Support and Cardiac Transplantation

Recommended Citation

Mejia Trebejo, M. O., Bravo Jaimes, K., Abelhad, N., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Sex Differences In Outcomes Of Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 77 (18_Supplement_1), 824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(21)02183-5