Contact Lens Prescribing Trends for Keratoconus at an Academic Medical Center: Increased Utilization of Scleral Lenses for Severe Disease
Department
Ophthalmology
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Eye & Contact Lens
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe contact lens prescription trends for patients with keratoconus. METHODS: Demographics, corneal curvature, visual acuity, and type of contact lens prescribed were reviewed for all patients with keratoconus evaluated in the contact lens service in 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: There were 292 patients in 2010 and 217 in 2020. In 2010, 69% were using corneal gas-permeable lenses (GP), 16% soft toric, 13% hybrid, and 2% soft sphere with no scleral lens (SL). In 2020, 60% were using corneal GP, 22% SL, 12% soft toric, 5% hybrid, and 1% soft sphere. Mean log of minimum angle of resolution visual acuities with manifest refraction were (represented in mean [SD, range]) 0.42 (0.33, 0-1.3) in 2010 and 0.35 (0.33, 0-1.6) in 2020 improving to 0.19 (0.18, 0-1.3; P≤ 0.01) and 0.13 (0.14, 0-0.60; P< 0.01) with contact lenses. Mean keratometry measurement in patients using SLs was 53.0 diopters (D) (9.9, 42.1-84.5), which was steeper than 46.6 D in patient's using all other lens types in 2010 and 2020 (3.9, 40.9-57.9; P< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral lens prescription increased during the past decade; however, corneal GP lenses remain the most frequent lens prescribed for patients with keratoconus in this cohort. Despite being prescribed for patients with the most advanced disease, SLs provide good visual acuity.
First Page
58
Last Page
62
DOI
10.1097/ICL.0000000000000869
Volume
48
Issue
2
Publication Date
2-1-2022
Medical Subject Headings
Academic Medical Centers; Contact Lenses; Humans; Keratoconus (drug therapy); Refraction, Ocular; Sclera
PubMed ID
35058416
Recommended Citation
Scanzera, A. C., Deeley, M., Joslin, C., McMahon, T. T., & Shorter, E. (2022). Contact Lens Prescribing Trends for Keratoconus at an Academic Medical Center: Increased Utilization of Scleral Lenses for Severe Disease. Eye & Contact Lens, 48 (2), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000869